Shachf Lieberman vs Noa Major Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W W L L L
Form
L L L W L W W L L LH2H: Lieberman 2 - 0 Major
They have played 5 sets in total, with Lieberman winning 4 and Major winning 1. The last match between Lieberman and Major was at the W25 Kiryat Motzkin, 07-11-2022, Q3, Hard with Shachf Lieberman getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Shachf Lieberman | 2 |
| Noa Major | 0 |
W25 Kiryat Motzkin(07-11-2022)
6
3
6
2
| Lieberman | Stats | Major |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | N/A |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 22 | Age | 20 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 49% (38-40) | Career Total W/L | 41% (11-16) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shelton VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Rybakina VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Shachf Lieberman
Player
Noa Major
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
11
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
6%
(
1 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
| 6-2 4-6 10-6 |
Stats
Shachf Lieberman
Player
Noa Major
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
3 of
23)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
54%
(
35 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
41 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 32 | Games Won | 19 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 14 |
| 1:37:30 | Average Match Time | 1:37:30 |
| 68% (82/120) | 1st Serve % | 64% (73/114) |
| 54% (44/82) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (40/73) |
| 45% (17/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 10% (4/41) |
| 76% (13/17) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 80% (8/10) |
| 61% (70/114) | Return Points Win % | 49% (59/120) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Shachf Lieberman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Daria Kuczer
Player
Shachf Lieberman
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
8
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Eleni Christofi
Player
Shachf Lieberman
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
49%
(
29 of
59)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
5
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shachf Lieberman
Player
Darja Suvirdjonkova
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
38%
(
21 of
56)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
18
43%
(
13 of
30)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
53%
(
26 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shachf Lieberman
Player
June Bjork
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
25 of
38)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Nadiya Kolb
Player
Shachf Lieberman
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Shachf Lieberman
Player
Margarita Ignatjeva
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
51%
(
34 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Milovanovic
Player
Shachf Lieberman
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
47%
(
37 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shachf Lieberman
Player
Margarita Ignatjeva
54%
(
49 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
52%
(
47 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
43 of
86)
87
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Noa Major Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Kylie Bilchev
Player
Noa Major
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
9
59%
(
17 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anca Alexia Todoni
Player
Noa Major
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
43%
(
17 of
40)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
17 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sofia Maria Barbulescu
Player
Noa Major
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
42%
(
19 of
45)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
11
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
18 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Jelena Cvijanovic
Player
Noa Major
50%
(
35 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Noa Major
Player
Gabriela Miteva
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
5
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
30 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pei-Chi Lee
Player
Noa Major
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
6
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
16 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shachf Lieberman
Player
Noa Major
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
11
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
6%
(
1 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 49% (38/40) | Win/Loss | 41% (11/16) |
| 47% (82/91) | Sets Win/Loss | 42% (25/34) |
| 50% (765/772) | Games Win/Loss | 47% (258/286) |
| 45% (19/23) | Hard Win/Loss | 40% (8/12) |
| 53% (19/17) | Clay Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 35 | Aces Total | 7 |
| 0.41 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.38 |
| 304 | Total Double Faults | 102 |
| 1:2:37 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 255.37 | Average Opponent Rank | 213.48 |
| 58% (1688/2886) | 1st Serve % | 60% (580/961) |
| 57% (967/1688) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (310/580) |
| 40% (474/1198) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (133/381) |
| 47% (199/422) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (50/100) |
| 48% (1430/2954) | Return Points Win % | 44% (415/945) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 42% (13/18) | Challenger W/L | 31% (5/11) |
| 53% (25/22) | Futures W/L | 55% (6/5) |
| 49% (38/78) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 41% (11/27) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (3/8) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (2/4) |
| 65% (11/17) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 89% (38/34) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (10/9) |
| 11% (38/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (10/1) |
| 10% (40/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (17/2) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
